The CPU performance analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2200M and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 in games, and the comparison of technical specs and benchmark results. It’s time to define the best CPU, using all technical data and the comparison result.
General Information
Technical Specifications
Dimensions and Compatibility
RAM Frequency and Speed
Port and Display Support
Technologies
API support
GPU Comparison in Games
It is time to learn whether NVIDIA Quadro K2200M and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 are good for gaming and streaming. So, it is enough to pick up a game and start the GPU analysis which will be formed for different screen resolutions. The GPU with a high FPS is considered to be a real winner in the comparison.
|
low
1280x720 |
med.
1920x1080 |
high
1920x1080 |
ultra
1920x1080 |
QHD
2560x1440 |
4K
3840x2160 |
||
| Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | NVIDIA Quadro K2200M | ||||||
| AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | |||||||
| Death Stranding (2020) | NVIDIA Quadro K2200M | ||||||
| AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | |||||||
| F1 2020 (2020) | NVIDIA Quadro K2200M | ||||||
| AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | |||||||
| Gears Tactics (2020) | NVIDIA Quadro K2200M | ||||||
| AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | |||||||
| Doom Eternal (2020) | NVIDIA Quadro K2200M | ||||||
| AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | |||||||
| Legend | |
| 5 | Stutter – Too low performance of the GPU is not able to draw 5 frames per sec to the full extent. |
| 15 | May Stutter – The system requirements are not compatible with the GPU. Some lags are possible even at low monitor resolution. |
| 30 | Fluent – The GPU is able to draw from 20 to 30 frames per sec. It is a poor result by now. |
| 40 | Fluent – Here are the average system requirements. The graphics accelerator will run at less than 40 frames per sec.. |
| 60 | Fluent – The GPU efficiently copes with the detailed drawing of more than 60 frames per sec. It is a good result. |
| May Run Fluently – The perfect balance of gaming performance and technical specifications of the GPU. | |
| ? | Uncertain – There is a lack of information for data analysis... |
| Uncertain – There is a little information for making FPS statistics... | |
| In the comparison of GPUs, it is really important which of them - NVIDIA Quadro K2200M or AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 - is better for games with different system settings. | |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
0.45% faster in synthetic tests
Cheaper ($125 vs $279)
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
More pipelines (1024 vs 640)
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 28 nm)
Less power consumption (50 Watt vs 65 Watt)
More maximum RAM amount (4 GB vs 2 GB)
Higher memory bandwidth (96 GB/s vs 80 GB/s)
So, NVIDIA Quadro K2200M or AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100? Which GPU is Better?
Based on the analysis of technical specifications and benchmark results, we recommend the NVIDIA Quadro K2200M GPU. It is better, faster and more efficient in games and operational apps.
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 in Benchmarks
Compare the evaluation of NVIDIA Quadro K2200M and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 in synthetic benchmarks of performance. The benchmarks show a position in the rating by the number of points of the each GPU. A GPU with the highest score wins.
PassMark GPU Benchmark is a free open-source benchmarking utility that measures the performance of your graphics card. The benchmark runs a series of tests on your GPU and provides a score that can be compared to other GPUs. PassMark GPU Benchmark is a great way to see how your GPU compares to other GPUs on the market and to identify any potential performance issues.
Is the NVIDIA Quadro K2200M better than AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100? - User Rating.
