NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
VS
Intel UHD Graphics 630

The CPU performance analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 in games, and the comparison of technical specs and benchmark results. It’s time to define the best CPU, using all technical data and the comparison result.

VS

General Information

340
Place in performance rating
516
32.73
Value for money (0-100)
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 9.5
GP108
Code name
Comet Lake GT2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
17 May 2017
Release date
1 October 2017
$79
Launch price (MSRP)
$91
Price now

Technical Specifications

384
Pipelines
184
1228 MHz
Core clock speed
300 MHz
1468 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1,800 million
Transistor count
189 million
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
30 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
35.23
Texture fill rate
26.45
1,127 gflops
Floating-point performance
460.8 gflops

Dimensions and Compatibility

PCIe 3.0 x4
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
145 mm
Length
None
Supplementary power connectors

RAM Frequency and Speed

GDDR5
Memory type
System Shared
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
64 Bit
Memory bus width
6008 MHz
Memory clock speed
48.06 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
-
Shared memory
+

Port and Display Support

1x DVI, 1x HDMI
Display Connectors
No outputs
+
G-SYNC support

Technologies

+
VR Ready
+
Multi Monitor
+
Multi-Projection
no data
Quick Sync
+

API support

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
+
Vulkan

GPU Comparison in Games

It is time to learn whether NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 are good for gaming and streaming. So, it is enough to pick up a game and start the GPU analysis which will be formed for different screen resolutions. The GPU with a high FPS is considered to be a real winner in the comparison.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 31 15 13 10
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 18.5 11.8 9.5
Intel UHD Graphics 630
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 92.7 41.6 30.7 18.6 13.7 4.82
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 105.9 35.7 24.2 15.4 8.9
Intel UHD Graphics 630 38.1 13.2 7.5 5.4
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 38.4 17.6 14.9 14.2
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend
5 Stutter – Too low performance of the GPU is not able to draw 5 frames per sec to the full extent.
15 May Stutter – The system requirements are not compatible with the GPU. Some lags are possible even at low monitor resolution.
30 Fluent – The GPU is able to draw from 20 to 30 frames per sec. It is a poor result by now.
40 Fluent – Here are the average system requirements. The graphics accelerator will run at less than 40 frames per sec..
60 Fluent – The GPU efficiently copes with the detailed drawing of more than 60 frames per sec. It is a good result.
May Run Fluently – The perfect balance of gaming performance and technical specifications of the GPU.
? Uncertain – There is a lack of information for data analysis...
Uncertain – There is a little information for making FPS statistics...
In the comparison of GPUs, it is really important which of them - NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 or Intel UHD Graphics 630 - is better for games with different system settings.

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030

6.54% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (384 vs 184)

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

Less power consumption (15 Watt vs 30 Watt)

So, NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 or Intel UHD Graphics 630? Which GPU is Better?

Based on the analysis of technical specifications and benchmark results, we recommend the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 GPU. It is better, faster and more efficient in games and operational apps.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630 in Benchmarks

Compare the evaluation of NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 in synthetic benchmarks of performance. The benchmarks show a position in the rating by the number of points of the each GPU. A GPU with the highest score wins.

Is the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 better than Intel UHD Graphics 630? - User Rating.

3.8 Out of 474 votes User Rating
3.5 Out of 207 votes User Rating