Intel UHD Graphics 630
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730

The CPU performance analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 in games, and the comparison of technical specs and benchmark results. It’s time to define the best CPU, using all technical data and the comparison result.

VS

General Information

516
Place in performance rating
647
Value for money (0-100)
13.08
Generation 9.5
Architecture
Fermi
Comet Lake GT2
Code name
GF108
Desktop
Type
Desktop
1 October 2017
Release date
18 June 2014
Launch price (MSRP)
$59.99
Price now
$72

Technical Specifications

184
Pipelines
96
300 MHz
Core clock speed
700 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
189 million
Transistor count
585 million
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
15 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
49 Watt
26.45
Texture fill rate
11.2 GT/s
460.8 gflops
Floating-point performance
268.8 gflops

Dimensions and Compatibility

PCIe 3.0 x1
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Length
145 mm
Supplementary power connectors
None

RAM Frequency and Speed

System Shared
Memory type
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
25.6 GB/s
+
Shared memory
no data

Port and Display Support

No outputs
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA

Technologies

+
Quick Sync
no data

API support

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6

GPU Comparison in Games

It is time to learn whether Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 are good for gaming and streaming. So, it is enough to pick up a game and start the GPU analysis which will be formed for different screen resolutions. The GPU with a high FPS is considered to be a real winner in the comparison.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel UHD Graphics 630
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Death Stranding (2020) Intel UHD Graphics 630
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
F1 2020 (2020) Intel UHD Graphics 630
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel UHD Graphics 630 38.1 13.2 7.5 5.4
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel UHD Graphics 630
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Legend
5 Stutter – Too low performance of the GPU is not able to draw 5 frames per sec to the full extent.
15 May Stutter – The system requirements are not compatible with the GPU. Some lags are possible even at low monitor resolution.
30 Fluent – The GPU is able to draw from 20 to 30 frames per sec. It is a poor result by now.
40 Fluent – Here are the average system requirements. The graphics accelerator will run at less than 40 frames per sec..
60 Fluent – The GPU efficiently copes with the detailed drawing of more than 60 frames per sec. It is a good result.
May Run Fluently – The perfect balance of gaming performance and technical specifications of the GPU.
? Uncertain – There is a lack of information for data analysis...
Uncertain – There is a little information for making FPS statistics...
In the comparison of GPUs, it is really important which of them - Intel UHD Graphics 630 or NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 - is better for games with different system settings.

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

1.81% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (184 vs 96)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 40 nm)

Less power consumption (15 Watt vs 49 Watt)

G-SYNC support

VR Ready

Multi Monitor

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730

There is no accountable advantage

So, Intel UHD Graphics 630 or NVIDIA GeForce GT 730? Which GPU is Better?

Based on the analysis of technical specifications and benchmark results, we recommend the Intel UHD Graphics 630 GPU. It is better, faster and more efficient in games and operational apps.

Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 in Benchmarks

Compare the evaluation of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 in synthetic benchmarks of performance. The benchmarks show a position in the rating by the number of points of the each GPU. A GPU with the highest score wins.

Is the Intel UHD Graphics 630 better than NVIDIA GeForce GT 730? - User Rating.

3.5 Out of 207 votes User Rating
2.8 Out of 243 votes User Rating