AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
VS
Intel UHD Graphics 630

The CPU performance analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and Intel UHD Graphics 630 in games, and the comparison of technical specs and benchmark results. It’s time to define the best CPU, using all technical data and the comparison result.

VS

General Information

98
Place in performance rating
516
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Generation 9.5
Navi 12
Code name
Comet Lake GT2
Mobile workstation
Type
Desktop
15 June 2020
Release date
1 October 2017

Technical Specifications

2560
Pipelines
184
no data
Core clock speed
300 MHz
1030 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
no data
Transistor count
189 million
7 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
50 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
164.8
Texture fill rate
26.45
no data
Floating-point performance
460.8 gflops

Dimensions and Compatibility

PCIe 4.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
None
Supplementary power connectors
medium sized
Laptop size

RAM Frequency and Speed

HBM2
Memory type
System Shared
8 GB
Maximum RAM amount
2048 Bit
Memory bus width
1540 MHz
Memory clock speed
394.2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
-
Shared memory
+

Port and Display Support

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

no data
Quick Sync
+

API support

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6

GPU Comparison in Games

It is time to learn whether AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and Intel UHD Graphics 630 are good for gaming and streaming. So, it is enough to pick up a game and start the GPU analysis which will be formed for different screen resolutions. The GPU with a high FPS is considered to be a real winner in the comparison.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Intel UHD Graphics 630
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Intel UHD Graphics 630 38.1 13.2 7.5 5.4
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend
5 Stutter – Too low performance of the GPU is not able to draw 5 frames per sec to the full extent.
15 May Stutter – The system requirements are not compatible with the GPU. Some lags are possible even at low monitor resolution.
30 Fluent – The GPU is able to draw from 20 to 30 frames per sec. It is a poor result by now.
40 Fluent – Here are the average system requirements. The graphics accelerator will run at less than 40 frames per sec..
60 Fluent – The GPU efficiently copes with the detailed drawing of more than 60 frames per sec. It is a good result.
May Run Fluently – The perfect balance of gaming performance and technical specifications of the GPU.
? Uncertain – There is a lack of information for data analysis...
Uncertain – There is a little information for making FPS statistics...
In the comparison of GPUs, it is really important which of them - AMD Radeon Pro 5600M or Intel UHD Graphics 630 - is better for games with different system settings.

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M

39.12% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (2560 vs 184)

Finer manufacturing process technology (7 nm vs 14 nm)

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

Less power consumption (15 Watt vs 50 Watt)

G-SYNC support

VR Ready

Multi Monitor

So, AMD Radeon Pro 5600M or Intel UHD Graphics 630? Which GPU is Better?

Based on the analysis of technical specifications and benchmark results, we recommend the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M GPU. It is better, faster and more efficient in games and operational apps.

AMD Radeon Pro 5600M vs Intel UHD Graphics 630 in Benchmarks

Compare the evaluation of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and Intel UHD Graphics 630 in synthetic benchmarks of performance. The benchmarks show a position in the rating by the number of points of the each GPU. A GPU with the highest score wins.

Is the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M better than Intel UHD Graphics 630? - User Rating.

5.0 Out of 7 votes User Rating
3.5 Out of 207 votes User Rating