AMD A6-6400K vs Intel Core i3-4102E Comparison by technical specs (TDP, performance, memory, compatibility). CPU performance analysis in the benchmark comparison (in the mode of a single core and all the cores).
Which CPU is better for gaming and apps?
A comparative analysis of the technical specifications of AMD A6-6400K and Intel Core i3-4102E reveals which model is better suited for gaming and operational apps. We recommend paying attention to the yellow-highlighted specs, as these are the most important factors to consider when choosing a CPU for these purposes.
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
The number of cores and the base frequency are two important factors that affect the CPU's performance. A CPU with more cores can simultaneously execute more tasks, and a CPU with a higher base frequency can execute tasks faster.
Internal Graphics
Hardware codec support
RAM and PCIe
The memory and PCIe specifications of a processor are important factors to consider when choosing a processor for your needs. If you need a processor with high memory capacity and a fast memory clock speed for gaming or other demanding applications, then you should choose a processor with a high-end memory and PCIe configuration.
Encryption
Thermal Management
Thermal Design Power (TDP) is a measure of the amount of heat that a processor dissipates when operating. The higher the TDP, the more heat the processor dissipates and the more powerful the cooling system needs to be to prevent it from overheating.
When choosing a processor, it is important to consider the TDP and the type of cooling that is available. Processors with a higher TDP will require more powerful cooling, which may require a more expensive motherboard or case.
TDP measures the heat a processor dissipates. Higher TDP requires more powerful cooling.
Technical details
Devices using this processor
CPU generation and family
AMD A6-6400K vs Intel Core i3-4102E
Which to buy
The benchmark comparison of AMD A6-6400K and Intel Core i3-4102E allows defining which CPU is currently better, more modern and efficient. The more points, the better.
Compare Benchmarks
Real world tests of AMD A6-6400K vs Intel Core i3-4102E:
Cinebench R20 is a cross-platform testing tool that measures CPU performance. It is based on the Cinema 4D rendering engine, which is used by professional animators and designers. Cinebench R20 is a reliable and accurate benchmark that can be used to compare the performance of different CPUs. The multi-core test in Cinebench R20 measures the performance of all CPU cores. This is a good test for measuring the CPU's ability to handle multiple tasks simultaneously. The higher the score, the better the CPU's performance. The Cinebench R20 multi-core test is a good way to compare the performance of different CPUs. It is a reliable and accurate benchmark that can be used to measure the CPU's ability to handle multiple tasks simultaneously.
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS) is a measure of the floating-point performance of an integrated graphics processing unit (iGPU). It is measured in gigaflops (GFLOPs), which is a billion floating-point operations per second. The higher the GFLOPs, the better the iGPU's floating-point performance. Floating-point performance is important for tasks that require a lot of calculations, such as video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific computing.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Measures the performance of a single CPU core. Higher score means better performance. Used to compare the performance of different CPUs.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core) is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the multi-core performance of a processor. It uses a set of tasks that require a lot of resources to get an accurate result. Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core) is a good way to compare the performance of different processors, as well as to learn how changes to settings can affect performance.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core) is a benchmark that measures the single-core performance of a processor. It is a cross-platform benchmark that is available for Windows, macOS, and Linux. The benchmark uses a set of real-world tasks to measure the performance of the processor, and it reports the results in points. The benchmark can be used to compare the performance of different processors, and it can also be used to learn how changes to settings can affect performance.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core) is a cross-platform benchmark that measures the multi-core performance of a processor. It uses a set of real-world tasks to measure the performance of the processor, and it reports the results in points. The benchmark can be used to compare the performance of different processors, and it can also be used to learn how changes to settings can affect performance.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core) is a free and open-source benchmark tool that measures the performance of a single CPU core. It is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a popular 3D animation software. Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core) is a good way to compare the single-core performance of different CPUs. It can also be used to test the stability of a CPU.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core) is a free cross platform 3D benchmark. It is based on the Cinema 4D animation software and it evaluates the rendering performance of a computer. Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core) is a good way to compare the performance of different CPUs and GPUs.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
The PassMark CPU Mark is a benchmark that measures the performance of a computer's central processing unit (CPU). The benchmark is based on a variety of tests, including single-threaded performance, multi-threaded performance, and memory performance. The PassMark CPU Mark is a good way to compare the performance of different CPUs, and it can also be used to track the performance of a CPU over time.
