NVIDIA Quadro K5200
VS
AMD FirePro W9000

The CPU performance analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K5200 and AMD FirePro W9000 in games, and the comparison of technical specs and benchmark results. It’s time to define the best CPU, using all technical data and the comparison result.

VS

General Information

173
Place in performance rating
171
4.03
Value for money (0-100)
6.12
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GK110B
Code name
Tahiti
Workstation
Type
Workstation
22 July 2014
Release date
14 June 2012
$1,699.74
Launch price (MSRP)
$3,999
$1660
Price now
$1103

Technical Specifications

2304
Pipelines
2048
667 MHz
Core clock speed
975 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
7,080 million
Transistor count
4,313 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
150 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
350 Watt
148.0
Texture fill rate
124.8
3,553 gflops
Floating-point performance
3,994 gflops

Dimensions and Compatibility

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
267 mm
Length
279 mm
1x 6-pin
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
no data
Form factor
full height / full length

RAM Frequency and Speed

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR5
8 GB
Maximum RAM amount
6 GB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
384 Bit
6008 MHz
Memory clock speed
5500 MHz
192.3 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
264 GB/s

Port and Display Support

2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI
no data
StereoOutput3D
+
no data
Dual-link DVI support
+

API support

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
+
Vulkan
no data

GPU Comparison in Games

It is time to learn whether NVIDIA Quadro K5200 and AMD FirePro W9000 are good for gaming and streaming. So, it is enough to pick up a game and start the GPU analysis which will be formed for different screen resolutions. The GPU with a high FPS is considered to be a real winner in the comparison.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K5200
AMD FirePro W9000
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K5200
AMD FirePro W9000
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K5200
AMD FirePro W9000
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K5200
AMD FirePro W9000
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K5200
AMD FirePro W9000
Legend
5 Stutter – Too low performance of the GPU is not able to draw 5 frames per sec to the full extent.
15 May Stutter – The system requirements are not compatible with the GPU. Some lags are possible even at low monitor resolution.
30 Fluent – The GPU is able to draw from 20 to 30 frames per sec. It is a poor result by now.
40 Fluent – Here are the average system requirements. The graphics accelerator will run at less than 40 frames per sec..
60 Fluent – The GPU efficiently copes with the detailed drawing of more than 60 frames per sec. It is a good result.
May Run Fluently – The perfect balance of gaming performance and technical specifications of the GPU.
? Uncertain – There is a lack of information for data analysis...
Uncertain – There is a little information for making FPS statistics...
In the comparison of GPUs, it is really important which of them - NVIDIA Quadro K5200 or AMD FirePro W9000 - is better for games with different system settings.

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5200

More pipelines (2304 vs 2048)

Less power consumption (150 Watt vs 350 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (8 GB vs 6 GB)

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9000

0.24% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($1103 vs $1660)

Higher memory bandwidth (264 GB/s vs 192.3 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA Quadro K5200 or AMD FirePro W9000? Which GPU is Better?

Based on the analysis of technical specifications and benchmark results, we recommend the AMD FirePro W9000 GPU. It is better, faster and more efficient in games and operational apps.

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs AMD FirePro W9000 in Benchmarks

Compare the evaluation of NVIDIA Quadro K5200 and AMD FirePro W9000 in synthetic benchmarks of performance. The benchmarks show a position in the rating by the number of points of the each GPU. A GPU with the highest score wins.

Is the NVIDIA Quadro K5200 better than AMD FirePro W9000? - User Rating.

5.0 Out of 2 votes User Rating
0.0 Out of 0 votes User Rating