NVIDIA Quadro K5200
VS
AMD Caicos

The CPU performance analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K5200 and AMD Caicos in games, and the comparison of technical specs and benchmark results. It’s time to define the best CPU, using all technical data and the comparison result.

VS

General Information

173
Place in performance rating
1051
4.03
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GK110B
Code name
Caicos
Workstation
Type
Desktop
22 July 2014
Release date
no data
$1,699.74
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$1660
Price now
no data

Technical Specifications

2304
Pipelines
160
667 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
771 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
7,080 million
Transistor count
370 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
150 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
148.0
Texture fill rate
no data
3,553 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data

Dimensions and Compatibility

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
no data
267 mm
Length
no data
1x 6-pin
Supplementary power connectors
no data

RAM Frequency and Speed

GDDR5
Memory type
no data
8 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
256 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
6008 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
192.3 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data

Port and Display Support

2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
no data

API support

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
+
Vulkan
no data

GPU Comparison in Games

It is time to learn whether NVIDIA Quadro K5200 and AMD Caicos are good for gaming and streaming. So, it is enough to pick up a game and start the GPU analysis which will be formed for different screen resolutions. The GPU with a high FPS is considered to be a real winner in the comparison.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K5200
AMD Caicos
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K5200
AMD Caicos
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K5200
AMD Caicos
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K5200
AMD Caicos
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K5200
AMD Caicos
Legend
5 Stutter – Too low performance of the GPU is not able to draw 5 frames per sec to the full extent.
15 May Stutter – The system requirements are not compatible with the GPU. Some lags are possible even at low monitor resolution.
30 Fluent – The GPU is able to draw from 20 to 30 frames per sec. It is a poor result by now.
40 Fluent – Here are the average system requirements. The graphics accelerator will run at less than 40 frames per sec..
60 Fluent – The GPU efficiently copes with the detailed drawing of more than 60 frames per sec. It is a good result.
May Run Fluently – The perfect balance of gaming performance and technical specifications of the GPU.
? Uncertain – There is a lack of information for data analysis...
Uncertain – There is a little information for making FPS statistics...
In the comparison of GPUs, it is really important which of them - NVIDIA Quadro K5200 or AMD Caicos - is better for games with different system settings.

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5200

28.11% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (2304 vs 160)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

Reasons to consider the AMD Caicos

There is no accountable advantage

So, NVIDIA Quadro K5200 or AMD Caicos? Which GPU is Better?

Based on the analysis of technical specifications and benchmark results, we recommend the NVIDIA Quadro K5200 GPU. It is better, faster and more efficient in games and operational apps.

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs AMD Caicos in Benchmarks

Compare the evaluation of NVIDIA Quadro K5200 and AMD Caicos in synthetic benchmarks of performance. The benchmarks show a position in the rating by the number of points of the each GPU. A GPU with the highest score wins.

Is the NVIDIA Quadro K5200 better than AMD Caicos? - User Rating.

5.0 Out of 2 votes User Rating
0.0 Out of 0 votes User Rating