AMD Radeon R7 260X
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K5000

The CPU performance analysis of AMD Radeon R7 260X and NVIDIA Quadro K5000 in games, and the comparison of technical specs and benchmark results. It’s time to define the best CPU, using all technical data and the comparison result.

VS

General Information

301
Place in performance rating
241
26.29
Value for money (0-100)
11.66
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
Bonaire
Code name
GK104
Desktop
Type
Workstation
8 October 2013
Release date
17 August 2012
$139
Launch price (MSRP)
$2,499
$132
Price now
$385
reference
Design
no data

Technical Specifications

896
Pipelines
1536
no data
Core clock speed
706 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
2,080 million
Transistor count
3,540 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
115 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
122 Watt
61.60
Texture fill rate
90.37
1,971 gflops
Floating-point performance
2,169 gflops

Dimensions and Compatibility

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
170 mm
Length
267 mm
1 x 6-pin
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
PCIe 3.0
Bus support
no data

RAM Frequency and Speed

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR5
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
5400 MHz
104 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
172.8 GB/s

Port and Display Support

2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
+
Eyefinity
no data
+
HDMI
no data

Technologies

+
FreeSync
no data
+
DDMA audio
no data

API support

DirectX® 12
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
+

GPU Comparison in Games

It is time to learn whether AMD Radeon R7 260X and NVIDIA Quadro K5000 are good for gaming and streaming. So, it is enough to pick up a game and start the GPU analysis which will be formed for different screen resolutions. The GPU with a high FPS is considered to be a real winner in the comparison.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon R7 260X
NVIDIA Quadro K5000
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon R7 260X
NVIDIA Quadro K5000
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon R7 260X
NVIDIA Quadro K5000
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon R7 260X
NVIDIA Quadro K5000
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon R7 260X
NVIDIA Quadro K5000
Legend
5 Stutter – Too low performance of the GPU is not able to draw 5 frames per sec to the full extent.
15 May Stutter – The system requirements are not compatible with the GPU. Some lags are possible even at low monitor resolution.
30 Fluent – The GPU is able to draw from 20 to 30 frames per sec. It is a poor result by now.
40 Fluent – Here are the average system requirements. The graphics accelerator will run at less than 40 frames per sec..
60 Fluent – The GPU efficiently copes with the detailed drawing of more than 60 frames per sec. It is a good result.
May Run Fluently – The perfect balance of gaming performance and technical specifications of the GPU.
? Uncertain – There is a lack of information for data analysis...
Uncertain – There is a little information for making FPS statistics...
In the comparison of GPUs, it is really important which of them - AMD Radeon R7 260X or NVIDIA Quadro K5000 - is better for games with different system settings.

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 260X

Cheaper ($132 vs $385)

Less power consumption (115 Watt vs 122 Watt)

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000

4.1% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (1536 vs 896)

Higher memory bandwidth (172.8 GB/s vs 104 GB/s)

So, AMD Radeon R7 260X or NVIDIA Quadro K5000? Which GPU is Better?

Based on the analysis of technical specifications and benchmark results, we recommend the NVIDIA Quadro K5000 GPU. It is better, faster and more efficient in games and operational apps.

AMD Radeon R7 260X vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 in Benchmarks

Compare the evaluation of AMD Radeon R7 260X and NVIDIA Quadro K5000 in synthetic benchmarks of performance. The benchmarks show a position in the rating by the number of points of the each GPU. A GPU with the highest score wins.

Is the AMD Radeon R7 260X better than NVIDIA Quadro K5000? - User Rating.

3.6 Out of 25 votes User Rating
4.2 Out of 6 votes User Rating