AMD Radeon R7 260X
VS
AMD Cypress

The CPU performance analysis of AMD Radeon R7 260X and AMD Cypress in games, and the comparison of technical specs and benchmark results. It’s time to define the best CPU, using all technical data and the comparison result.

VS

General Information

301
Place in performance rating
not rated
26.29
Value for money (0-100)
no data
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Bonaire
Code name
Cypress
Desktop
Type
Desktop
8 October 2013
Release date
no data
$139
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$132
Price now
no data
reference
Design
no data

Technical Specifications

896
Pipelines
1600
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
2,080 million
Transistor count
2,154 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
115 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
61.60
Texture fill rate
no data
1,971 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data

Dimensions and Compatibility

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
no data
170 mm
Length
no data
1 x 6-pin
Supplementary power connectors
no data
PCIe 3.0
Bus support
no data

RAM Frequency and Speed

GDDR5
Memory type
no data
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
128 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
104 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data

Port and Display Support

2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
no data
+
Eyefinity
no data
+
HDMI
no data

Technologies

+
FreeSync
no data
+
DDMA audio
no data

API support

DirectX® 12
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4

GPU Comparison in Games

It is time to learn whether AMD Radeon R7 260X and AMD Cypress are good for gaming and streaming. So, it is enough to pick up a game and start the GPU analysis which will be formed for different screen resolutions. The GPU with a high FPS is considered to be a real winner in the comparison.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon R7 260X
AMD Cypress
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon R7 260X
AMD Cypress
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon R7 260X
AMD Cypress
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon R7 260X
AMD Cypress
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon R7 260X
AMD Cypress
Legend
5 Stutter – Too low performance of the GPU is not able to draw 5 frames per sec to the full extent.
15 May Stutter – The system requirements are not compatible with the GPU. Some lags are possible even at low monitor resolution.
30 Fluent – The GPU is able to draw from 20 to 30 frames per sec. It is a poor result by now.
40 Fluent – Here are the average system requirements. The graphics accelerator will run at less than 40 frames per sec..
60 Fluent – The GPU efficiently copes with the detailed drawing of more than 60 frames per sec. It is a good result.
May Run Fluently – The perfect balance of gaming performance and technical specifications of the GPU.
? Uncertain – There is a lack of information for data analysis...
Uncertain – There is a little information for making FPS statistics...
In the comparison of GPUs, it is really important which of them - AMD Radeon R7 260X or AMD Cypress - is better for games with different system settings.

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 260X

14.02% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

Reasons to consider the AMD Cypress

More pipelines (1600 vs 896)

So, AMD Radeon R7 260X or AMD Cypress? Which GPU is Better?

Based on the analysis of technical specifications and benchmark results, we recommend the AMD Radeon R7 260X GPU. It is better, faster and more efficient in games and operational apps.

AMD Radeon R7 260X vs AMD Cypress in Benchmarks

Compare the evaluation of AMD Radeon R7 260X and AMD Cypress in synthetic benchmarks of performance. The benchmarks show a position in the rating by the number of points of the each GPU. A GPU with the highest score wins.

Is the AMD Radeon R7 260X better than AMD Cypress? - User Rating.

3.6 Out of 25 votes User Rating
0.0 Out of 0 votes User Rating