AMD Cypress
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560

The CPU performance analysis of AMD Cypress and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 in games, and the comparison of technical specs and benchmark results. It’s time to define the best CPU, using all technical data and the comparison result.

VS

General Information

not rated
Place in performance rating
330
no data
Value for money (0-100)
10.69
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Cypress
Code name
GF114
Desktop
Type
Desktop
no data
Release date
17 May 2011
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$199
no data
Price now
$294

Technical Specifications

1600
Pipelines
336
no data
Core clock speed
810 MHz
2,154 million
Transistor count
1,950 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
45.36
no data
Floating-point performance
1,088.6 gflops
no data
Maximum GPU temperature
99 °C

Dimensions and Compatibility

no data
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
8.25" (21 cm)
no data
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pin
no data
SLI options
+
no data
Bus support
16x PCI-E 2.0
no data
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)

RAM Frequency and Speed

no data
Memory type
GDDR5
no data
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
no data
Memory bus width
256 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
128.0 GB/s

Port and Display Support

no data
Display Connectors
Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI
no data
Multi monitor support
+
no data
HDCP
+
no data
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
no data
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
no data
HDMI
+

Technologies

no data
3D Vision
+
no data
CUDA
+
no data
3D Gaming
+
no data
3D Blu-Ray
+

API support

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.1

GPU Comparison in Games

It is time to learn whether AMD Cypress and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 are good for gaming and streaming. So, it is enough to pick up a game and start the GPU analysis which will be formed for different screen resolutions. The GPU with a high FPS is considered to be a real winner in the comparison.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cypress
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cypress
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cypress
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cypress
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cypress
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
Legend
5 Stutter – Too low performance of the GPU is not able to draw 5 frames per sec to the full extent.
15 May Stutter – The system requirements are not compatible with the GPU. Some lags are possible even at low monitor resolution.
30 Fluent – The GPU is able to draw from 20 to 30 frames per sec. It is a poor result by now.
40 Fluent – Here are the average system requirements. The graphics accelerator will run at less than 40 frames per sec..
60 Fluent – The GPU efficiently copes with the detailed drawing of more than 60 frames per sec. It is a good result.
May Run Fluently – The perfect balance of gaming performance and technical specifications of the GPU.
? Uncertain – There is a lack of information for data analysis...
Uncertain – There is a little information for making FPS statistics...
In the comparison of GPUs, it is really important which of them - AMD Cypress or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 - is better for games with different system settings.

Reasons to consider the AMD Cypress

More pipelines (1600 vs 336)

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560

12.7% faster in synthetic tests

So, AMD Cypress or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560? Which GPU is Better?

Based on the analysis of technical specifications and benchmark results, we recommend the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 GPU. It is better, faster and more efficient in games and operational apps.

AMD Cypress vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 in Benchmarks

Compare the evaluation of AMD Cypress and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 in synthetic benchmarks of performance. The benchmarks show a position in the rating by the number of points of the each GPU. A GPU with the highest score wins.

Is the AMD Cypress better than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560? - User Rating.

0.0 Out of 0 votes User Rating
3.9 Out of 66 votes User Rating