AMD Cypress
VS
ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2

The CPU performance analysis of AMD Cypress and ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 in games, and the comparison of technical specs and benchmark results. It’s time to define the best CPU, using all technical data and the comparison result.

VS

General Information

not rated
Place in performance rating
643
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
Cypress
Code name
RV670
Desktop
Type
Desktop
no data
Release date
4 April 2008
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$349

Technical Specifications

1600
Pipelines
320
no data
Core clock speed
669 MHz
2,154 million
Transistor count
666 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
140 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
10.70
no data
Floating-point performance
2x 428.2 gflops

Dimensions and Compatibility

no data
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
267 mm

RAM Frequency and Speed

no data
Memory type
GDDR3
no data
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
no data
Memory bus width
256 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
1656 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
52.99 GB/s

Port and Display Support

no data
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API support

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3

GPU Comparison in Games

It is time to learn whether AMD Cypress and ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 are good for gaming and streaming. So, it is enough to pick up a game and start the GPU analysis which will be formed for different screen resolutions. The GPU with a high FPS is considered to be a real winner in the comparison.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cypress
ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cypress
ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cypress
ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cypress
ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cypress
ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2
Legend
5 Stutter – Too low performance of the GPU is not able to draw 5 frames per sec to the full extent.
15 May Stutter – The system requirements are not compatible with the GPU. Some lags are possible even at low monitor resolution.
30 Fluent – The GPU is able to draw from 20 to 30 frames per sec. It is a poor result by now.
40 Fluent – Here are the average system requirements. The graphics accelerator will run at less than 40 frames per sec..
60 Fluent – The GPU efficiently copes with the detailed drawing of more than 60 frames per sec. It is a good result.
May Run Fluently – The perfect balance of gaming performance and technical specifications of the GPU.
? Uncertain – There is a lack of information for data analysis...
Uncertain – There is a little information for making FPS statistics...
In the comparison of GPUs, it is really important which of them - AMD Cypress or ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 - is better for games with different system settings.

Reasons to consider the AMD Cypress

More pipelines (1600 vs 320)

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 55 nm)

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2

3.78% faster in synthetic tests

So, AMD Cypress or ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2? Which GPU is Better?

Based on the analysis of technical specifications and benchmark results, we recommend the ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 GPU. It is better, faster and more efficient in games and operational apps.

AMD Cypress vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 in Benchmarks

Compare the evaluation of AMD Cypress and ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2 in synthetic benchmarks of performance. The benchmarks show a position in the rating by the number of points of the each GPU. A GPU with the highest score wins.

Is the AMD Cypress better than ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2? - User Rating.

0.0 Out of 0 votes User Rating
0.0 Out of 0 votes User Rating