AMD Cedar
VS
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

The CPU performance analysis of AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile in games, and the comparison of technical specs and benchmark results. It’s time to define the best CPU, using all technical data and the comparison result.

VS

General Information

1052
Place in performance rating
30
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
Cedar
Code name
TU104
Desktop
Type
Mobile workstation
no data
Release date
27 May 2019

Technical Specifications

80
Pipelines
3072
no data
Core clock speed
1035 / 1350 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
292 million
Transistor count
13,600 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
110 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
296.6

Dimensions and Compatibility

no data
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Laptop size
large

RAM Frequency and Speed

no data
Memory type
GDDR6
no data
Maximum RAM amount
16 GB
no data
Memory bus width
256 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
14000 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
448.0 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Port and Display Support

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs
no data
G-SYNC support
+

Technologies

no data
VR Ready
+
no data
Multi Monitor
+

API support

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
+

GPU Comparison in Games

It is time to learn whether AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile are good for gaming and streaming. So, it is enough to pick up a game and start the GPU analysis which will be formed for different screen resolutions. The GPU with a high FPS is considered to be a real winner in the comparison.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
Legend
5 Stutter – Too low performance of the GPU is not able to draw 5 frames per sec to the full extent.
15 May Stutter – The system requirements are not compatible with the GPU. Some lags are possible even at low monitor resolution.
30 Fluent – The GPU is able to draw from 20 to 30 frames per sec. It is a poor result by now.
40 Fluent – Here are the average system requirements. The graphics accelerator will run at less than 40 frames per sec..
60 Fluent – The GPU efficiently copes with the detailed drawing of more than 60 frames per sec. It is a good result.
May Run Fluently – The perfect balance of gaming performance and technical specifications of the GPU.
? Uncertain – There is a lack of information for data analysis...
Uncertain – There is a little information for making FPS statistics...
In the comparison of GPUs, it is really important which of them - AMD Cedar or NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile - is better for games with different system settings.

Reasons to consider the AMD Cedar

There is no accountable advantage

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

69.62% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (3072 vs 80)

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 nm vs 40 nm)

G-SYNC support

VR Ready

Multi Monitor

So, AMD Cedar or NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile? Which GPU is Better?

Based on the analysis of technical specifications and benchmark results, we recommend the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile GPU. It is better, faster and more efficient in games and operational apps.

AMD Cedar vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile in Benchmarks

Compare the evaluation of AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile in synthetic benchmarks of performance. The benchmarks show a position in the rating by the number of points of the each GPU. A GPU with the highest score wins.

Is the AMD Cedar better than NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile? - User Rating.

0.0 Out of 0 votes User Rating
5.0 Out of 37 votes User Rating