AMD Cedar
VS
ATI Radeon HD 3870

The CPU performance analysis of AMD Cedar and ATI Radeon HD 3870 in games, and the comparison of technical specs and benchmark results. It’s time to define the best CPU, using all technical data and the comparison result.

VS

General Information

1052
Place in performance rating
738
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
Cedar
Code name
RV670
Desktop
Type
Desktop
no data
Release date
19 November 2007
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$269

Technical Specifications

80
Pipelines
320
no data
Core clock speed
777 MHz
292 million
Transistor count
666 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
106 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
12.43
no data
Floating-point performance
497.3 gflops

Dimensions and Compatibility

no data
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
241 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin

RAM Frequency and Speed

no data
Memory type
GDDR4
no data
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
no data
Memory bus width
256 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
2252 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
72.06 GB/s

Port and Display Support

no data
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API support

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3

GPU Comparison in Games

It is time to learn whether AMD Cedar and ATI Radeon HD 3870 are good for gaming and streaming. So, it is enough to pick up a game and start the GPU analysis which will be formed for different screen resolutions. The GPU with a high FPS is considered to be a real winner in the comparison.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cedar
ATI Radeon HD 3870
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cedar
ATI Radeon HD 3870
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cedar
ATI Radeon HD 3870
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cedar
ATI Radeon HD 3870
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cedar
ATI Radeon HD 3870
Legend
5 Stutter – Too low performance of the GPU is not able to draw 5 frames per sec to the full extent.
15 May Stutter – The system requirements are not compatible with the GPU. Some lags are possible even at low monitor resolution.
30 Fluent – The GPU is able to draw from 20 to 30 frames per sec. It is a poor result by now.
40 Fluent – Here are the average system requirements. The graphics accelerator will run at less than 40 frames per sec..
60 Fluent – The GPU efficiently copes with the detailed drawing of more than 60 frames per sec. It is a good result.
May Run Fluently – The perfect balance of gaming performance and technical specifications of the GPU.
? Uncertain – There is a lack of information for data analysis...
Uncertain – There is a little information for making FPS statistics...
In the comparison of GPUs, it is really important which of them - AMD Cedar or ATI Radeon HD 3870 - is better for games with different system settings.

Reasons to consider the AMD Cedar

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 55 nm)

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3870

3.66% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (320 vs 80)

So, AMD Cedar or ATI Radeon HD 3870? Which GPU is Better?

Based on the analysis of technical specifications and benchmark results, we recommend the ATI Radeon HD 3870 GPU. It is better, faster and more efficient in games and operational apps.

AMD Cedar vs ATI Radeon HD 3870 in Benchmarks

Compare the evaluation of AMD Cedar and ATI Radeon HD 3870 in synthetic benchmarks of performance. The benchmarks show a position in the rating by the number of points of the each GPU. A GPU with the highest score wins.

Is the AMD Cedar better than ATI Radeon HD 3870? - User Rating.

0.0 Out of 0 votes User Rating
4.0 Out of 9 votes User Rating