AMD Cedar
VS
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150

The CPU performance analysis of AMD Cedar and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 in games, and the comparison of technical specs and benchmark results. It’s time to define the best CPU, using all technical data and the comparison result.

VS

General Information

1052
Place in performance rating
414
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Polaris
Cedar
Code name
Polaris 11
Desktop
Type
Mobile workstation
no data
Release date
1 March 2017

Technical Specifications

80
Pipelines
896
no data
Boost Clock
1053 MHz
292 million
Transistor count
no data
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm

Dimensions and Compatibility

no data
Laptop size
medium sized

RAM Frequency and Speed

no data
Memory type
GDDR5
no data
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
no data
Memory bus width
128 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
7000 MHz
no data
Shared memory
-

Technologies

no data
FreeSync
+
no data
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
+

API support

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
DirectX 12
4.4
OpenGL
no data

GPU Comparison in Games

It is time to learn whether AMD Cedar and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 are good for gaming and streaming. So, it is enough to pick up a game and start the GPU analysis which will be formed for different screen resolutions. The GPU with a high FPS is considered to be a real winner in the comparison.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150
Legend
5 Stutter – Too low performance of the GPU is not able to draw 5 frames per sec to the full extent.
15 May Stutter – The system requirements are not compatible with the GPU. Some lags are possible even at low monitor resolution.
30 Fluent – The GPU is able to draw from 20 to 30 frames per sec. It is a poor result by now.
40 Fluent – Here are the average system requirements. The graphics accelerator will run at less than 40 frames per sec..
60 Fluent – The GPU efficiently copes with the detailed drawing of more than 60 frames per sec. It is a good result.
May Run Fluently – The perfect balance of gaming performance and technical specifications of the GPU.
? Uncertain – There is a lack of information for data analysis...
Uncertain – There is a little information for making FPS statistics...
In the comparison of GPUs, it is really important which of them - AMD Cedar or AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 - is better for games with different system settings.

Reasons to consider the AMD Cedar

There is no accountable advantage

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150

9.69% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (896 vs 80)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 40 nm)

So, AMD Cedar or AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150? Which GPU is Better?

Based on the analysis of technical specifications and benchmark results, we recommend the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 GPU. It is better, faster and more efficient in games and operational apps.

AMD Cedar vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Benchmarks

Compare the evaluation of AMD Cedar and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 in synthetic benchmarks of performance. The benchmarks show a position in the rating by the number of points of the each GPU. A GPU with the highest score wins.

Is the AMD Cedar better than AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150? - User Rating.

0.0 Out of 0 votes User Rating
3.0 Out of 2 votes User Rating